5 min read
•
Composable
•
August 7, 2025
A composable storefront doesn't just pay off the build. It clears the debt that’s been building inside your stack for years.
If you're leading digital at a large retailer or a multi-brand group, this has probably come up already: "How fast do we get a return on a composable build?"
Fair question. Composable projects do require upfront investment. They need time, budget, and executive attention. But the payoff isn’t just in the tech you launch. It's in the legacy systems and workflows you leave behind.
The value shows up when your teams stop waiting for dev queues, start shipping faster, and no longer rely on expensive workarounds to do basic things.
A composable storefront doesn't just pay off the build. It clears the debt that’s been building inside your stack for years.
Most people frame ROI too narrowly. They ask if composable saves money compared to what they’re already doing. And if it makes money if all they do is change the front-end framework. It does both. But the better question is whether it clears the friction that keeps your teams from doing their best work.
Faster time to market
Marketing and merch teams push campaigns, content, and experiments without waiting for staging, QA, or a dev sprint to open up.
More autonomy across teams
No more Jira tickets for basic content updates. A well-structured CMS lets non-technical teams work directly inside the experience. This autonomy stretches right through to some elements of structure like menus.
Less tech debt
When you replace rigid templates and legacy CMSs with modular systems, maintenance gets lighter and upgrades stop being emergencies.
Better customer experience
Faster front-ends and personalized flows drive stronger engagement (+20-40%) and better conversion (~+20% on mobile). That has real revenue impact.
No wasted license spend
Composable means using the tools you actually need. You’re not paying for a suite full of features no one uses. This somewhat relies on your ability to negotiate good deals from new vendors and better deals from your platform. But composable opens this door and all of these guys want your business a great deal.
Not every composable build hits its targets. The architecture helps, but the outcome depends on the process.
Don't start at the starting line
Many accelerators other SIs brag about are just reskinned versions of the composable storefront sample storefront from Salesforce. They are essentially worthless. The 64labs accelerator is an integrated set of code, process, and embedded expertise where key decisions have been made based on experience, where full-feature integrations have been pre-built with the vendor overseeing, where there is a way to getting the site done quickly that we stand behind in our contracts. With 64labs you start a 100m race 40m from the finish.
Pick the right partners
Composable tools only deliver if they play well together. That’s why we work directly with partners like Contentstack, Amplience, Algolia, Vercel, Adyen and Dynamic Yield to build fast and smooth. But your key partner is your engineering partner. There are some other good partners out there. But no one has the experience and focus on composable of 64labs.
Enable internal teams
We don’t just ship the site. We do a handover right. Your team gets documentation, training, and structured onboarding. They have helped build parts of the site. They retain access to our top people post-launch even without a contract. If they can manage the platform without us, we’ve done it right. If you want us to stick around and keep the momentum of the build going - and there can be a strong case for that for some retailers upgrading in other areas of the enterprise stack (ERP, OMS, WMS) whose team cannot own the architecture right away - 64labs can hold the fort and improve the weaponry while that work gets done.
Legacy platforms come with hidden costs. Every delayed release, every workaround, every missed campaign window adds up.
If your team is stuck supporting brittle code, locked into slow cycles, or limited in personalization, the price isn’t just technical. It’s operational debt. And it compounds every quarter. And AI is not going to slow that baby down.
Composable cuts that cycle. It unlocks execution speed and lets your teams push ideas out into the world instead of waiting for backlog relief.
If your business has complexity—multiple brands, regions, or fast-moving teams - composable is not optional. It's the structure that lets digital teams actually run.
And if you're on Salesforce Commerce Cloud, the backend is already strong. Composable is how you level up the front-end to match.
Done right, it doesn’t just pay for itself. It gives your team the flexibility they’ve been asking for and the momentum your business needs.
Let’s Talk. Want to see what ROI from composable could look like for your storefront? Contact us here.
5 min read
•
July 15, 2025
Composable
Ecommerce
How Does Composable Help Marketers and Merchants
Marketers and merchandisers in enterprise retail are often stuck in a weird paradox: they have powerful ideas, agile teams, and massive goals, but a tech stack that moves like it's 2012. If launching a promo takes 3 JIRA tickets and 2 weeks of dev time, you're not just behind, you're bleeding money.
Enter composable commerce: a modular, API-first approach to building digital storefronts. While it sounds like a developer’s dream (and it is), the biggest wins actually show up for marketers and merchants.
Here’s how.
Composable means your frontend is decoupled from your backend. So when merch or marketing wants to:
...they can do it without dev involvement (or with minimal support). Teams can use low-code/no-code tools integrated into the stack (like CMSs or visual merch tools) to make changes in hours, not weeks. And dev teams, before you get too upset, these guys have been using tag managers and personalization tools behind your back to do things they shouldn't for about 10 years now. This is better-safer-transparenter than that.
Result: Faster go-to-market, more A/B testing, more wins.
Legacy monoliths often treat personalization like a bolt-on feature, not a core capability. Composable stacks let you plug in best-in-class personalization engines (we have hard-core expertise in or Dynamic Yield) that actually talk to your content and commerce layers in real-time.
Marketers can then:
Now, it better be built correctly by a partner who knows what they are doing. (cough). And that partner better be in the weeds with your team on what it has to do where (double cough). And you better be willing to out some work into making it work rather than think it automagically improves conversions (whooping cough). But a composable architecture does unlock all this.
Result: Better CX, higher conversion rates, more data to refine.
Composable gives you control over your frontend experience. Sure you have, like templates with like Bootstrap n stuff that you can play with. But repeat after me - ISML is DISML. With composable you are a world of React and Typescript and kittens. You get to control how the site looks, feels, and behaves instead of being locked into the templates someone thought were state of the art back in 2014.
This means your brand team can:
…without getting a “that’s not possible with our CMS” reply from IT.
Result: Experience-driven commerce, not catalog-driven commerce.
Move fast and break stuff they say. Yeah, great advice for a 20 year old building an app no one wil likely ever have to use. We don;t get that luxury. Marketers and merchandisers are constantly caught between "move fast" and "absolutely don’t break stuff."
Composable gives us a middle ground:
Result: Less stress, more autonomy, more velocity, more control.
{{banner}}
Worried about an old school Big Bang launch of composable? Don't be. You can put a full composable site out to a subset of users for as long as you want before you have to commit ? Don’t be. Most enterprise teams go with a split launch - maybe 5% of users to start. They iron out any kinks. Then when they realize how much the ROI will be if they switch over like right now, they switch.
You can go incremental of course.
You can plug in a headless CMS (like Contenstack or Amplience), run it headlessly within your legacy stack for a while, and prove ROI before ripping anything out. Or un composable with a new CMS in one region for six months to give yourselves some experience of both before rolling out globally.
Result: Low risk, high reward — easy to minimize risk and you keep IT on your side.
In a world where campaigns move at the speed of culture and conversion windows last minutes, composable lets marketers and merchandisers do what they do best: create, launch, measure, and optimize without waiting for devs, approvals, or outdated systems to catch up.
5 min read
•
July 15, 2025
Composable
Ecommerce
Monolithic vs. Composable Commerce: Which One Actually Lets You Move
Monolithic commerce platforms still dominate the legacy install base. But composable architecture is quietly and quickly becoming the default for brands that want to move fast, personalize better, and scale smart. Here’s why.
At some point, every digital team hits the same wall: is your commerce platform pushing you forward, or is it quietly holding you back?
Monolithic platforms are familiar. Everything in one place. One contract, one vendor, one roadmap to follow. That made sense when stability was the goal. But the game has changed.
Composable commerce is built for movement. It splits the stack into parts—CMS, search, checkout, personalization—and connects them through APIs. So each part of your business can evolve on its own terms.
This isn’t a backend engineering preference. It’s a strategic foundation for shipping faster, experimenting more, and building digital experiences that keep up with the customer.
{{banner}}
Modern brands move on short timelines. Product drops, geo-expansion, A/B tests, loyalty programs, AI-driven content—none of that fits neatly inside the old dev cycle.
Monolithic platforms slow things down. One small update means full regression testing. Teams queue up behind each other. Deadlines slip. Innovation fades.
Composable fixes that. You want to try a new CMS? Plug it in. Want to update the frontend? Do it without touching the checkout. Want to test two search vendors? Go for it.
Decoupled systems let every team move at their own pace. No more waiting for a single system to catch up.
{{banner}}
There are still situations where a monolith makes sense. Simpler teams, tighter budgets, fewer moving parts. If your business needs one site and one language, all-in-one can be fine.
But once you scale, that simplicity becomes a constraint. You’ll find yourself spending more time working around the platform than improving your experience.
Composable takes more planning upfront. You need to pick tools, define APIs, structure your stack. But once it’s in place, you’re in control. Not locked to a vendor’s roadmap. Not bottlenecked by a bundled release schedule.
Say your team wants to relaunch the site, overhaul search, add personalization, and expand to three new countries. And marketing still needs to push campaigns live weekly.
In a monolithic setup, that’s a six-month program with a lot of dependencies and delays.
In a composable world, content updates go through the CMS, personalization gets tested in isolation, and the frontend evolves alongside the rollout. Each stream moves independently. That means fewer collisions and more shipping.
Monolithic platforms had their moment. And for some teams, they’re still good enough. But if your brand is growing, diversifying, or trying to accelerate, composable is probably the better fit.
It gives your teams control. It frees you from outdated timelines. And it lets your tech stack evolve with the business, not behind it.
Let’s Talk. If you’re wondering what composable could unlock for your business, We’d be happy to show you.